Document Author
Year Published
- 2015 (7) Apply 2015 filter
- 2004 (2) Apply 2004 filter
- 2007 (2) Apply 2007 filter
- 2008 (2) Apply 2008 filter
- 2013 (2) Apply 2013 filter
- 2014 (2) Apply 2014 filter
- 1995 (1) Apply 1995 filter
- 2003 (1) Apply 2003 filter
- 2009 (1) Apply 2009 filter
- 2011 (1) Apply 2011 filter
- 2012 (1) Apply 2012 filter
- 2016 (1) Apply 2016 filter
- 2018 (1) Apply 2018 filter
- 2022 (1) Apply 2022 filter
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Ethics Education filter Ethics Education
- Judicial Ethics (17) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Judges (14) Apply Judges filter
- Self-Help Centers (11) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (8) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Unbundling (8) Apply Unbundling filter
- Strategic Planning (7) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Articles & SRLN Briefs (6) Apply Articles & SRLN Briefs filter
- Attorney Ethics (5) Apply Attorney Ethics filter
- Courts (5) Apply Courts filter
- Forms (5) Apply Forms filter
- Private Bar (5) Apply Private Bar filter
- Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics (4) Apply Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics filter
- Conferences & Summits (3) Apply Conferences & Summits filter
- Forms (3) Apply Forms filter
- Libraries (3) Apply Libraries filter
- Plain Language & LEP (3) Apply Plain Language & LEP filter
- Presentations (3) Apply Presentations filter
- Research (3) Apply Research filter
- Simplification (3) Apply Simplification filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (2) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (2) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Legal Aid (2) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (2) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Plain Language (2) Apply Plain Language filter
- Regulatory Concerns (2) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (2) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Trainer of the Trainer Materials / Curricula (2) Apply Trainer of the Trainer Materials / Curricula filter
- Triage (2) Apply Triage filter
- Automated Forms & E-Filing (1) Apply Automated Forms & E-Filing filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Constitutional Issues (1) Apply Constitutional Issues filter
- Funding (1) Apply Funding filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- LEP and Access (1) Apply LEP and Access filter
- Reports (1) Apply Reports filter
- Technology (1) Apply Technology filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Search results
Article: Judicial Techniques for Cases Involving Self-Represented Litigants (Albrecht, Greacen, Hough and Zorza 2003)
This is one of the first article published to stimulate a national dialogue about how judges can best structure and manage their courtrooms to accommodate the needs of self-represented litigants. It remains one of the most accessible introductions to the ...
Article: Practical Advice from the Trenches (Wilson & Hutchins 2015)
This article, by Judge Wilson and Judge Hitchins of Baltimore, discusses the value of neutral engagement in easy the tensions for the judge in the SRL courtroom. They write, "Fortunately, through a concept called neutral engagement, judges now have a ...
Article: No Legal Advice from Court Personnel- What Does that Mean (Greacen 1995)
This is the seminal article that explores the underlying rationale that resulted in the blanket prohibition of clerk's not being able to provide information to the public for fear that it would be advice. In the article, Greacen suggests the framewor ...
Article: The Disconnect Between the Requirements of Judicial Neutrality and Those of the Appearance of Neutrality when Parties Appear Pro Se: Causes, Solutions, Recommendations, and Implications (Zorza 2004)
In this article Richard Zorza explores the concept of engaged neutrality which, when employed by the judge, creates a more transparent and arguably more ethically neutral playing field for the self-represented litigant. Recommended Citation: Richard Zorza ...
Article: Turner v. Rogers- Improving Due Process for the Self-Represented (Zorza 2012)
Article by Richard Zorza on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. Rogers (2011) and how courts should see this decision as an opportunity to improve their services and programs for self-represented litigants. Recommended Citation: Richard Zorza, ...
Tool: Limited Scope Risk Management Materials (California Commission on Access to Justice 2004)
The California Commission on Access to Justice developed comprehensive risk management materials to help lawyers develop ethical unbundled or limited scope practices. The materials are designed to help lawyers document their file and ensure that they and ...
Report: Analysis of Rules That Enable Lawyers to Serve Self-Represented Litigants with Unbundling (ABA 2014)
The white paper, An Analysis of Rules That Enable Lawyers to Serve Self-Represented Litigants, was prepared by the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services. The purpose of the paper is to provide policy makers with i ...
SRLN Brief: Integrating Unbundling into Self-Help Services (SRLN 2015)
The states vary tremendously on how they may have integrated unbundling into their service delivery systems. Unbundling is a critical link to devloping a local ecosystem that supports 100% access to justice, and therefore should be a priority area for dev ...
SRLN Brief: Case for Key Innovations to Support 100% Access (SRLN 2007)
Collection of single page briefing papers prepared by the SRLN in 2007 to help interested parties make the "case for" key innovations. The following topics are covered: • The Case for Self-Help Programs • The Case for Court-Based Forms and Inst ...
Curriculum: SRLN Court Solutions Conference Leadership Package (SRLN 2008)
The Self-Represented Litigation Leadership Package was prepared by the Self-Represented Litigation Network and launched at the Court Solutions Conference on September 8-10, 2008, in Baltimore, Maryland. The core of the Package is fifteen modules, each of ...